Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jordan Thompson vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Thompson vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Jordan Thompson vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Thompson 1 - 0 Broom
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Thompson has won 54.01% of points on their second serve, while Broom has won 52.42%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Thompson, in recent form, has won 46.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 56.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.34% and 31.3% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Thompson has saved 69.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Thompson has won 56.06% of matches played (W/L 37/ 29), with Broom winning 60.98% (W/L 50/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Thompson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 38/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 86/ 64). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Thompson has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 65.12% of matches (W/L 28/ 15), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.89% of matches (W/L 31/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Thompson winning 1 times and Broom being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Thompson winning 2 and Broom winning 0. The last match between Thompson and Broom was at the Columbus 2 Challenger, 20-09-2022, First, I.hard with Jordan Thompson getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:39.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Thompson and Broom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Thompson winning 0 times and Broom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Thompson winning 1, and Broom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Thompson has played against opponents with an average rank of 160.64 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 218.93.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Thompson has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Thompson has converted 34.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 37.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
36
Rank
32
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
284
Rank
284
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
60% (444-297)
Career Total W/L
63% (206-119)
55% (16-13)
YTD W/L
62% (21-13)
$2,870,555
Career Prize Money
$36,000
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:39 | 1:42:39 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (51/68) | 57% (46/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (38/51) | 74% (34/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (11/17) | 43% (15/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (2/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 40% (32/81) | 28% (19/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-2 |
Stats 
Jordan Thompson
Player
Charles Broom
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
46 of
81)
16
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jordan Thompson | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (16/13) | 62% (21/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (38/35) | 59% (48/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (354/362) | 52% (409/373) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 67% (14/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.55 |
| Aces Total | 166 | 211 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 33 | 85 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:2 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 151.21 | 200.59 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1378/2289) | 64% (1562/2430) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (968/1378) | 71% (1102/1562) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (492/911) | 52% (455/868) |
| BPs Won% Total | 34% (68/199) | 38% (103/274) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (845/2320) | 41% (1069/2627) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 68% (15/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 46% (6/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (15/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 62% (21/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 77% (10/13) | 64% (7/11) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (6/10) | 57% (8/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 84% (19/16) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 16% (19/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (13/4) | 33% (15/5) |
Jordan Thompson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
54 of
91)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
96
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pavel Kotov
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
79 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
113)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
54 of
79)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
44 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Jordan Thompson
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
56%
(
60 of
107)
1st Serve %
82%
(
86 of
105)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
86)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Jordan Thompson
60%
(
46 of
77)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(8) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
63%
(
84 of
133)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
51%
(
25 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
36%
(
48 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
36 of
108)
121
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Yibing Wu
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Jordan Thompson
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
95
Total Points Won
69
|
6-7(3) 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juncheng Shang
Player
Jordan Thompson
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Charles Broom
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Roberto Cid Subervi
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Blake Mott
Player
Charles Broom
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Henry Searle
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Blake Mott
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Robert Strombachs
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alexis Canter
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Alex Knaff
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
90
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
66 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Giles Hussey
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Thompson Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
